Contacts:
Shivani Sutaria
Equal Rights Advocates
(415) 575-2395
San Francisco, CA. (June 19, 2001) – Six
current and former Wal-Mart employees from California, Illinois, Ohio, Texas
and Florida have filed a massive nationwide sex discrimination class action
lawsuit today in U. S. District Court for the Northern District of California
(San Francisco) against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Case No. C 012252
MJJ). The case is believed to be the largest such suit ever filed
against a private employer.
The class action suit charges that
Wal-Mart discriminates against its female employees in promotions, compensation
and job assignments in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(Title VII). It claims that women are largely relegated to lower paying jobs
and systematically denied advancement opportunities.
Despite the fact that women comprise over 72%
of the Wal-Mart workforce, a very small percentage is represented in the
supervisory and managerial ranks:
·
Men hold 90% of Wal-Mart store manager
positions.
·
Less than one-third of store management
overall at Wal-Mart is
female -- a percentage far lower than the
number of female managers employed by Wal-Mart’s major competitors (56%), and
lower than the percentage employed by its competitors back in 1975.
·
There is only one woman among Wal-Mart’s
20 top officers.
The class in this case may include more
than an estimated 500,000 current and former female employees of Wal-Mart
retail stores in
Wal-Mart’s treatment
of its female employees includes a sexually demeaning atmosphere, where female
employees are told that “women do not make good managers”,
that “a trained monkey” could do their jobs,
and that women with kids couldn’t be managers.
Wal-Mart, a global retail giant, reported
sales in excess of $191 billion in 2000.
Currently 3,153 stores are owned and operated by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
in the
“The industry leader should not be the
discrimination leader. If Wal-Mart’s top competitors are able to promote
qualified women to more than half of their management jobs, why can’t
Wal-Mart?” said plaintiffs’ lead counsel Brad Seligman, Executive Director of
The Impact Fund, a nonprofit civil rights organization based in Berkeley, CA.
“While women in
“This lawsuit marks the D-Day assault
that will shatter the glass ceiling for women at
“We hope that Wal-Mart’s systematic and
harmful oppression of women will now be fully exposed,” say Stephen Tinkler and
Merit Bennett, partners of the
The female plaintiffs are represented by
The Impact Fund, Equal Rights Advocates, Public
Justice Center (Baltimore) and the private law firms of Cohen, Milstein,
Hausfeld & Toll, Davis Cowell & Bowe (SF) and Tinkler & Bennett
(Santa Fe, NM and Honolulu, HI) and represent the female plaintiffs in this
lawsuit. Plaintiffs’ counsel include some of the most
experienced class action and sex discrimination attorneys in the country.
A toll
free number (1-877-WOMAN-WM (966-2696)) and a website have been set up for
present and former female Wal-Mart workers to learn more about the case: www.walmartclass.com. A copy of the Complaint in the case, Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., is
available there and at www.CMHT.com.